1. The treatment is patently not working.

2. It's patently absurd not to wear a coat in such cold weather.

3. Their claim was patently false.

4. He made his displeasure patently obvious.

5. It was patently obvious that he was lying.

6. It was patently obvious that she was lying.

7. It's patently obvious that he doesn't care.

8. The whole idea was patently ridiculous.

9. It's patently obvious that you're in love with her.

10. She was patently lying.

11. Jenkins' explanation of the situation is patently absurd.

12. Her explanation was patently ridiculous.

13. Simon Zelotes is quite patently Simon the Zealot.

14. The conclusion is patently the wrong way around.

15. Their marketing strategy has patently failed to work.

16. But there were, patently, other advantages.

17. This is patently not the case.

18. The dominance of the academic tradition is patently supported by the major vested interest groups within education and the broader society.

18. Sentencedict.com is a sentence dictionary, on which you can find nice sentences for a large number of words.

19. He was patently lying.

20. She further offended doctors by clinging to patently wrong ideas.

21. This is patently evident from the way he depicted, on occasion, perfectly symbiotic kisses, embraces and bodies.

22. Because it is patently obvious that Rollins is not bullshitting or manipulating.

23. This is patently not an area that has been officially acknowledged.

24. It is patently obvious how a fear which is openly expressed can be passed on.

25. The statement is patently false and an embarrassing public demonstration of his weakness as university leader.

26. To say that the proposal has no disadvantages at all is patently untrue.

27. All that need be proved is that the matter is of a certain type and the manner of presentation patently offensive.

28. Don't try and set up something that is quite patently false.

29. If Cassie had not been so consumed by rage, she would have laughed at this last and patently childish remark.

30. Why, therefore, did congress not get on with the business of removing a patently guilty president?